It is probably not a new experience, but many projects trying to centralize organizations with the aim of more coordination and the realization of synergy effects have resulted apparently for each member of the organization in an increase of "red tape" (more paper, more external control, ...), while the promised effects are not so prominent. In a very interesting blog post Ricardo Alonso et al. summarize research results that seem to point towards an opposite strategy if coordination is paramount:
"Contrary to expectations, decentralization might be the best strategy when the need for coordination among divisions is paramount."
The blog post with some further reading suggestions can be found at: When Does Coordination Require Centralization?
Tags: strategy, management
All content on the site authored by Ulrich Schrader is licensed under a Creative Commons-License. Other licenses may apply for other authors.
Creative Commons explained
Comments
DrEurope (not verified)
Tue, 2009-09-29 10:45
Permalink
Hi, my name is Shanti Sherna
Hi, my name is Shanti Sherna from Ukraina. I'm 27 y.
I just love to read this forum articles & topics discussed here.
regards
Shanti,
Xtravelos (not verified)
Thu, 2009-10-08 10:33
Permalink
Article is the best what I
Article is the best what I saw before. Thx u a lot
Eradalrosse (not verified)
Tue, 2010-11-30 13:10
Permalink
Hi, this is a cool forum and
Hi, this is a cool forum and I'm looking forward to discussion.
I would add my blog if you want to check it out but I'll just put it in my profile.
Add new comment